4 Games in: Brook Lopez and a Foot in Progress

10 points. 5/14 shooting. Overwhelmed by a good, not great, center in Nikola Pekovic. Blown rotations. Missed bunnies and a lack of touch in and around the paint. Jumpers that had no chance of going in. Gettable rebounds that went elsewhere. Allowing other bigs to establish strong post position while failing to establish similar positions on the other end.

That was a recap Brook Lopez’s performance agaisnt the Minnesota Timberwolves, a disappointing 98-91 home loss that dropped the Nets to 2-2 on the young season.

Some of those problems sound like Lopez. Sure. He has struggled to rebound throughout his NBA career, and likely will never be a great rebounder. He does, at times, struggle to an extent with bigger, stronger NBA bigs. He does blow the occasional rotation or coverage. Those problems largely are what they are

But at the same time, much of Brook’s struggles were out of character with the player the NBA has grown accustomed to. Missed bunnies around the hoop? The jumpers 3 feet east of the hoop? The inability to score off a basic post up or get to the foul line? Atrocious defense? Brook suffers lapses as a defender but has progressed on that end since the move to Brooklyn. Yes, Lopez has his warts, some of which will not simply disappear. But, he’s clearly a better player than he was tonight.

Which brings 2 questions: What is the issue with Lopez, and how should Lionel Hollins handle it?

Maybe he’s out of shape: This is no knock on Lopez, specifically. When you sustain a severe foot injury, you cannot run. You cannot walk without the aid of a cane or cast. Can you lift weights? Sure. But an NBA game is a 2.5 hour grind, of intense running up and down a court. From December 20, 2013 through November 3, 2014, Brook did not do that, in a game that counted. Not once.

What happens when you stop running and moving? Your body becomes unaccustomed to running, moving, jumping. Your endurance declines. You tire, and tire quickly. And what happens when you’re tired? You don’t fight for post position, because you’re tired. Or make that quick rotation. Or give the extra bit of footwork on that jump hook necessary to get into position to score. You start making mistakes, bcause your body does not make the correct play instinctually.

Brook looks completely out of shape while he is on the floor: he looks fine, in regards to his weight and build. But as he plays, you see a player who is nowhere near ready to compete in an NBA game for 30-35 healthy productive minutes.

Maybe he’s feeling pain, or thinking about his foot: Of course, if Brook has foot pain, it would explain much of his poor play in game 2 back. But perhaps there is no pain, and he is thinking about his foot as he plays. It would be hard for Lopez not to think about his foot. Three surgical foot procedures since the NBA lockout ended. A realignment of the bones in his foot. A sprain almost immediately upon getting back onto the floor. It is understandable that while playing, Brook would think about his foot, hoping not to injure it and managing how he moves it.

The problem? Basketball requires moving swiftly. Using quick footwork to position yourself for that jump hook. Making that hard cut. pushing that offensive player on that box out. Sliding to make a quick rotation. Those things become hard to do when you are thinking “I cannot hurt my foot,” rather than thinking about the task at hand. And any sport is a game of inches. Being a half inch off balance on the jump hook is the difference between two points and a missed hook shot. Being a step slow on the defensive rotation is the difference between a basket for the Timberwolves and a good contest and stop for the Nets.

Whatever the reason, one thing is true: Lopez, while he has his problems even when playing his best basketball, is nowhere near that level at this moment. He has played two competitive, meaningful games since a third foot surgery and major realignment of the bone structure of his foot, and it is clear that he is nowhere near himself on the court. He looks uncomfortable, nervous about taking contact (this is not usually an issue: Brook is often maligned for not being physical but when healthy typically makes every effort to be aggressive, often limited by a lack of quickness and athleticism to beat a defender if anything, not a desire to), and out of place. That hopefully will change as the season progresses: if he can remain healthy, he should get his wind back and grow secure within his body once again.

So What does Lionel do from here? That is the tough balance.  While Mason Plumlee is perhaps more popular than Lopez: he is cheaper, younger, was not nearly traded for Dwight Howard, is more athletic (athleticism always gives the appearance of playing hard), and does not require the ball to be effective. However, for all the love for Plumlee, he commonly blows rotations, struggles every bit as much as Lopez on the glass, and, unlike Lopez, is not an elite scorer. The Nets are able to put Brook on the move, and run set plays designed to get Lopez baby hooks in the paint: the same plays are simply less effective when run for Plumlee.

Hollins knows that, and knows that, ultimately, when May comes, the Nets’ best lineups will feature Deron Williams, Joe Johnson, and Lopez.  Right now, that may not be the case: if Lopez is this compromised as he recovers from an injured man who could not walk without an aid into a rejuvenated all star, he is likely not as good of an option, at this particular juncture, as Plumlee.

That present Hollins with a tough issue to balance. Tonight, he played Lopez through his struggles. By doing that, you may help accelerate his injury recovery: the more healthy minutes, the less he is yanked from games, the better his confidence in himself and his foot, the more prepared he will be for the spring, when the Nets very much need not just a healthy, but a fully recovered Lopez. For all the talk of injuries being mental for Williams, they surely are for Lopez, whose personality lends itself to getting down on himself, and insecure in his abilities.

However, it is also true that if the Nets give Lopez less minutes when he is struggling, that they will be better off for it in the short term. Would Plumlee, +17 tonight in his minutes, have been more useful than Lopez in dealing with Pekovic down the stretch? NBA games are won and lost by many, and while no player is every fully to credit for a win or blame for a loss, Lopez bears the lion’s share of fault for the Nets loss to the Wolves. Pekovic absolutely owned him. While Ricky Rubio outplayed Williams late, Williams torched him all night (Williams lacked confidence late, or perhaps has conditioning issues in his injury recovery as well; his assertiveness declined as the game went on, but he also carried the Nets as the team stood and watched early). Johnson started slowly but had a great close to the game, and the Nets got some decent role player contributions from Jarrett Jack (his best game of the year), Mirza Teletovic, and even Alan Anderson.

The bottom line is that the Nets generally got enough from two of their top three players to win, and given Minnesota’s status as a likely lottery team, got just enough from their role players on their home floor. They played poorly overall but competed, and had they gotten decent center play against Pekovic, they would have won the game. What they got was awful center play, and Lopez was at the heart of it.

Would Plumlee have fared better? It’s very possible; plus minus can be misleading but it told a true tale tonight. But the Nets went with working on getting Lopez back to full throttle, as opposed to reacting to his poor play by playing Plumlee, who was having a better knight than Brook. 82 games sound like a lot but they disappear fast: last year, even in a slow starting Atlantic, the Nets could not recover from their 10-21 hole in time to win the Atlantic, and that team had more dimensions than this year’s version given the facets of smallball that Livingston and Pierce presented.

Essentially, Lopez’s poor play tonight felt like three parts injury recovery, one part “he is who he is.” As Lopez works on those three parts, expect some rough outings like tonight. But how long can Lionel ride him with the playoffs, home court, division, and overall team habits on the line?

Other Notes

Deron Williams’ start to the season deserves its own post. The he’s back proclamations are premature, because he is not back, but he is very much on the right path. If Utah Deron is a 10, and last year’s Deron is a 1, Deron is around a 6.5-7.5 at the moment — the improvement is significant, but not total, and he still struggles at time with his confidence as he rediscovers what he can do and grows accustomed to knowing his body’s limits. He is also struggling with his shooting given his nagging wrist/hand issue he has recently developed, and needs to stroke the ball more cleanly to open up more of his game. Alas, Deron looks better everytime he takes the court, and so far, so good regarding his recovery. Still, he’s not “back.” Not yet.

I love what I see from Lionel Hollins early in his tenure. There’s much to say, but one key: he has this team playing hard. The loss to Minnesota, while a bad loss that will sting, was an example. Minnesota last year would have stretched that 17-2 lead into a larger lead, or held it longer. The Nets did not allow that because they competed extremely hard. Lopez was awful. Kevin Garnett was bad. Multiple Nets were bad, or provided nothing of substance. Bojan Bogdanovic still can’t locate Kevin Martin. But the Nets competed, and that was why, despite playing a very very bad game from an execution perspective, they gave themselves a chance to win. They lost because they did not play well enough to get it done, but Lionel has the troops fighting.

Bojan Bogdanovic is off to a strong start from a developmental perspective. You can see his basketball IQ in timely cuts to the basket, and he can shoot the ball. He is a smart, instinctual player with clear NBA talent. He makes mistakes. He blows defensive coverages. But the talent is very clearly there, the upside very clearly there. The hope for Brooklyn is Bogdanovic is more productive in the spring than he is now. On that note, the hope is that Deron and Brook also are better in the spring than they are now.

Mirza Teletovic is playing very good basketball early in the season. Even his down game against the Wolves was as good as an average game for him a year ago.

Plumlee on Team USA? Maybe!

By: Jordan Patton

Mason Plumlee Likely to Make Team USA Over Demarcus Cousins
​In today’s world of social media supremacy, reactions from the American public have never been so readily accessible and for lack of a better word, vocal. When a Twitter user sees a tweet on the social media site that they do not agree with, their reaction is swift and extreme. Thursday evening was one of such occurrences for a large portion of the American public (read as: pretty much every non-Nets fan) as ESPN’s Brian Windhorst reported that the Nets’ Mason Plumlee is likely to make team USA’s 12-man roster for the FIBA World Cup over the vastly superior Demarcus Cousins of the Sacramento Kings. Windhorst’s tweet was met with hundreds of replies from Twitter users, most of them seemingly outraged that coach Krzyzewski and USA Basketball director Jerry Colangelo could possibly omit one of the Association’s top-5 centers in favor of an unproven Plumlee. Are these Twitter users completely out of line with their outrage and confusion? Of course they aren’t; on paper substituting Plumlee for Cousins makes very little sense. As we all know, however, the game is not played on paper.

​Now, I’m not going to sit here and tell you that bringing Plumlee to Spain is an absolute slam-dunk (pun 100% intended) and that Colangelo and Krzyzewski would be insane to leave him off the roster because that simply is not the case. If Windhorst’s report is correct and Plumlee does indeed make the 12-man roster, he will be the least-talented player on the team and there is simply no denying it. Cousins is the better player by a wide margin and I don’t think even the biggest Nets homer in the world would try to deny it. Cousins is one of if not the best offensive centers in the league and nobody is trying to take that away from him. The issue with bringing Cousins to Spain has almost nothing to do with his skill-set (I say almost because Cousins does most of his work in one-on-one situations which he is sure to see very few of with the talent that the USA has in its backcourt) and almost everything to do with his attitude and mental-toughness.

​Cousins has shown over the course of his career that he is quick to anger and not always able to control his emotions on the court. This could very well be disastrous for the USA if Cousins were to lose his temper during what’s sure to be an extremely physical matchup against the host-nation Spain. With Cousins you have an incredible talent who has a very large potential to cause trouble. Not to mention you add another superstar ego who will be upset if he feels he isn’t getting enough touches on offense. On the other hand you have mild-mannered Mason Plumlee who will work his butt off and try to be the best teammate he can possibly be. Plumlee is a perfect fit for coach K’s system (playing under him for four years at Duke certainly gives him an advantage in this aspect) and he will bend over backwards to do whatever is required of him.

​I just want to reiterate the point that I am not advocating for Plumlee to make the team over Cousins. Yesterday on Twitter there was seemingly an endless torrent of tweets saying that choosing Plumlee over Cousins made no sense whatsoever, and that simply isn’t the case. Plumlee will probably never be of the same caliber that Cousins is, that’s true, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a fit for this team because he truly is. At the end of the day, we are all USA Basketball fans and we want our country to send the best possible team to Spain, not necessarily the 12 best players. If the best team includes Cousins, excellent, let’s go USA. If the best team includes Plumlee, excellent, let’s go USA (also means I’m getting a USA Plumlee jersey because those jerseys are awesome).

Bojan Bogdanovic: How Does He Fit with the Nets’ Current Roster?

By: Anthony Pignatti 

The Brooklyn Nets (then New Jersey Nets) selected Bojan Bogdanovic with the 31st pick in the 2011 NBA draft. After three years playing overseas with Fenerbahce Ulker, he’s finally coming to play in the NBA after accepting a three-year, $10.3 million deal – according to ESPN.

Bogdanovic, listed at 6’8 216 lbs, offers the Nets an added layer of versatility – a facet Billy King and the Nets have sought ever since the Nets moved to Brooklyn. He’s most noted as a SG/SF, but in today’s NBA, he could play PF as well. This flexibility gives coach Hollins the luxury of mixing and matching his lineups in a number of different ways to take advantage of mismatches. In addition, Bogdanovic’s 6’8 frame adds a unique combination of size and scoring ability to the wing positions, especially important with the departure of the 6’7 Shaun Livingston. The addition of another versatile European player fits right in with what the Nets and owner Mikhail Prokhorov are trying to accomplish, both as an on-court product and as a global brand.

Bogdanovic, put simply, can score – from anywhere. Though not regarded as a primary ball-handler, he is able to create off the dribble and penetrate defenses in the crafty European manner we’ve seen from others in the NBA (ie. Manu Ginobili). He has a smooth looking jump-shot and gets it off in a hurry. With that said, it’s worth noting his inconsistencies. His 3-point percentage dipped from above 40% in ‘12-’13 with Fenerbahce to below 30% the following season. It remains to be seen how his offense will translate to the NBA game, but a sizeable scorer is a welcomed commodity for the Nets – especially with Paul Pierce suiting up in Washington next year.

With the Nets down three rotational players (and possibly more) from last season – Livingston, Blatche, and Thornton – Bojan has an opportunity to fill one of many potential roles for the upcoming season. Contingent on Hollins’ desired style, there are a number of interchangeable lineups that could have a significant impact on how the Nets play and their success doing so. The majority of the roster, along with Bogdanovic, can play 2 or even 3 positions. This leaves Hollins with an abundance of options at his disposal.

Here are some of the potential scenarios Bogdanovic could help the Nets next season:

Bogdanovic will almost certainly come off the bench in a reserve role for the 2014-2015 season. He could have an opportunity to fill the void left behind by Marcus Thornton – the lightning rod scoring punch off the bench. If Hollins envisions Jack playing alongside Williams in a starter’s role, there’s an opportunity for Bogdanovic to input instant offense as the backup wing to Jack and Joe Jesus.

Livingston’s departure leaves an expectant need in the backcourt and Jack will probably assume that role. However, Bogdanovic could be a better compliment to Williams’ game moreso than Jack. If he develops quickly, it’s possible he could eventually see starters’ minutes next to Williams. This gives the Nets a notable size advantage at the SG position. Couple his size and shooting ability, he may prove to be a very tough cover for teams with smaller guards, similar to the advantage Joe Johnson’s sees consistently.

Prior to Brook’s injury, the idea was to surround him with shooters and force defenses to collapse. Unfortunately, nothing other than Brook’s foot collapsed, forcing the Nets to play a completely different style by starting Pierce at PF. If Hollins implements a similar approach next season and Bogdanovic improves his shooting consistency, the Nets may have found their latest 3-point weapon. A mobile, knock-down shooting 6’8 SF can definitely help this team’s offense.

Possible but probably unlikely is the idea that Bojan could see minutes at PF next season. However, Bogdanovic’s defense is certainly at a lower standard than his offense, and his slender frame and underwhelming rebounding numbers while with Fenerbahce make this scenario unlikely. Still, teams have downsized their PFs for shooters, making this not out of the realm of possibilities. It’s plausible to think he could have a role as a stretch 4 in this league.

And of course, Bojan could simply not translate to the NBA at all. He lacks lateral quickness, a necessary skill required of guarding most NBA wings. His shooting inconsistencies, primarily from 3-point range, is worrisome. And he may never be able to find a consistent 23-foot range jumper.

Adding Bojan Bogdanovic adds another capable shooter to the current Net roster, along with size and versatility the Nets often covet. If Bogdanovic proves reliable as nothing other than a consistent shooter and at least a marginal defender, the Nets should be pleased with their European prospect. More dominos need to fall to have a clearer picture on how Bogdanovic may fit in with the Nets’ roster next season – but it’s clear he’ll have a number of opportunities for the sheer versatility he brings.

What if the Nets Never Got Deron Williams

By: Dylan Mendelowitz (@mendnba)

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012, a day that would forever change the Brooklyn Nets franchise. After two years of gathering win-now talent to convince him to stay, Deron Williams announced via Twitter his intentions to resign with the Brooklyn, instead of signing with his hometown Dallas Mavericks.

 

Nearly two full years later, the results have been underwhelming. Williams has dealt with numerous ankle injuries, and his play has been less than stellar. Brooklyn has yet to receive the $100 million man they thought they were getting when Williams was signed to a max contract, and while they have made the playoffs both seasons, they have finished well below expectations (especially in year 2), getting eliminated in the first and second rounds in their first two seasons.

 

Deron’s poor play and injury struggles bring up countless questions, on and off the court. An interesting one: What if Deron actually did leave for Dallas? What would the Nets roster look like today? Would they be better off?
Before Deron made his decision to re-sign, the Nets made several moves, getting big time players to try and entice Williams to stay, leaving them with a few core pieces, whether he stayed or not. If Deron had bolted for Dallas, Brooklyn would have been left with a core of Joe Johnson, Gerald Wallace, Kris Humphries and Brook Lopez. A solid lineup, but nothing special. While some reports surfaced that the Joe Johnson trade was contingent on Deron’s resigning, the Nets were also hellbent on bringing a winner to Brooklyn immediately. The trade for Joe: floatsam of expiring contracts and draft pick swap options for Joe Johnson – fits Billy King’s M.O. and I believe it still would have went down.

 

Deron was far and away the best player, and specifically point guard on the free agent market. There were other decent options, however, many of which the Nets were expected to pursue had Deron left. These players include names like Steve Nash, Jeremy Lin, Goran Dragic, Raymond Felton, Jason Kidd and a few other notables. While none of these were labeled as “stars” (sans Nash, who was much older), most were solid backup plans if Williams decided to leave. The most likely of the bunch seemed to be Jeremy Lin, who was coming off a breakout performance as a New York Knick, and is a big name who became very popular all throughout the world. With the Nets intent on making a splash immediately in Brooklyn, and Goran Dragic nowhere near the level he is at now, my money is on Lin being Brooklyn’s first starting point guard had Deron bolted.

 

So say Deron left, and Brooklyn outbids Houston for the services of Jeremy Lin. This leaves them with a backcourt of Jeremy Lin and Joe Johnson, and a frontcourt containing Gerald Wallace, Kris Humphries and Brook Lopez. Not so good looking, eh?

 

Of course, we know ended up happening to each player in that projected lineup. Jeremy Lin went to Houston, and has been decent, but has not been the special force he was during Linsanity. Joe Johnson and Brook Lopez worked out, as Johnson went on to become “Joe Jesus”, while Lopez became an All-Star. Wallace and Humphries, not as successful, as both have underwhelming seasons, the latter losing his starting job to Reggie Evans. While things could have worked out differently for each player if Deron really did leave, the lineup and roster looks less than stellar. Also notable: a key aspect to the trade for Pierce and Garnett was that both players desired playing with Deron. So last year’s team likely did not have them, Kirilenko (who came because of the trade), or Thornton (who was acquired for Terry, who came through the trade), if Deron is not here. Do the 2013-2014 Nets, who essentially finished as the east’s third or fourth best team, even make the playoffs without the Deron trade?

 

Perhaps the Nets could have been good without Deron, or even better than the Nets of this or last season. Maybe Jeremy Lin becomes an All-Star as a Net. Maybe Gerald Wallace and Kris Humphries play better with Lin quarterbacking the offense. There’s really no way to tell, but whether it was Lin, Nash (what a disaster that would have been), Dragic or any other point guard available in the 2012 off-season, it doesn’t look as if the Nets roster would be better off without Deron.

 

It’s easy to blame Deron Williams for the Nets’ failures over the past two seasons. He hasn’t lived up to his contract or former “superstar” title, and in the world’s biggest sports market, New York City, Deron’s struggles have been even more evident and publicized. But the New York media and social media leads people to believe he’s been downright terrible.

 

Truth is, Deron has been an average point guard. Not great, not terrible, but average. Average play from the point guard, dealing with chronic ankle pain (being repaired with surgery this offseason), isn’t as bad as everyone makes it out to be. Sure, he isn’t living up to his max contract and hasn’t taken the Nets as far as they were expected to go, but he really hasn’t been THAT bad.

 

After dual ankle surgery this offseason, I expect Deron to come back strong next season. Will he ever be the Deron of Utah? Probably not. But a healthy Deron Williams, regaining his confidence and explosiveness, is still capable of being a very good basketball player. He doesn’t need to carry the team, he doesn’t need to be the superstar Deron, but a good Deron Williams, will lead to a good Brooklyn Nets team.
The Brooklyn Nets would not be a better basketball team with Deron Williams in Dallas. The player he would be replaced with would be significantly less talented and would not have made the Nets any better off. One year from now, all of this talk of the Nets being better off without him will be nonsense. Deron Williams will bounce back and have a good year next year.

You can hold me to that.

 

So What’s Next

Whether we should have known as the tea leaves came in or not, we know now.  The Nets are going to be watching the balance ledger going forward.  They may not be tanking and will look to compete.  But the budget matters, and the goal of opening cap space for the summer of 2016: the summer of a mega free agent class of 2016, a cap which should be higher, and a landscape presenting the Nets with something they currently lack: options.

So what do the do in the interim?

I. The Roster

PG: Deron Williams, Jarrett Jack, Jorge Gutierrez (Nonguaranteed), Marquis Teague

SG: Joe Johnson, Markel Brown (if signed), Xavier Thames (if signed)

SF: Andrei Kirilenko, Bojan Bogdanovic (reportedly signed), Sergey Karasev

PF: Kevin Garnett (if he sticks around), Mirza Teletovic, Cory Jefferson (if signed)

C: Brook Lopez, Mason Plumlee

Of note, if you include Bogdanovic and all three second round picks, that’s 15 men, right there.  The Nets could conceivably stand pat right now, sign all three second rounders, and make no changes to the roster.  I do not foresee Thames making the roster, and Jefferson is likely to at least have to fight for a camp invite.  So I do see the Nets at least testing the free agency waters, to see who they can add.  But with only the minimum to spend, the shopping is going to be light.

II. The Cap Sheet

There’s only two deals on the ledgers for 2016 for guaranteed money: Deron Williams, and Bogdanovic if his deal is as reported.  While Deron has a player option for $22,331,135 (gulp), he is likely to exercise it because he’s not worth that money.  Maybe he’ll be truly franchise dedicated, opt out, and take less so the Nets have more flexibility that summer: I’ll hold my breath.

The other thing: there is not much the Nets can do on the trade market if they would like to get younger and cheaper.  Bogdanovic, Plumlee, Karasev, Teague, Gutierrez, Brown, Jefferson, and Thames? Those are pieces you keep around if you want to remain young and cheap.  Could the Nets entertain a trade? Sure. But the goal is also to leave the 2016 cap sheet free and clear, and those assets without control over tradeable first round picks leave the Nets short on assets for a significant piece.

Deron, Brook, and Joe occupy about $63 million of salary in 2015-2016: the Nets are basically anchored down to this roster so long as they have all 3 players.  The Nets could very well kick the tires around on any of the 3, especially if the goal is to cut costs. That would surely be dramatic.  But the only way to reshape the roster, and the financial picture, BEFORE 2016, is to deal at least one of those three pieces for an expiring contract. Otherwise, the Nets are looking at an offseason next summer in which they will flirt with the tax line, and will likely be limited to the full midlevel exception and biannual exception in adding to the roster.

Is dealing Deron Joe or Brook smart? That’s an open question, and my answer is probably not.  But if you want a roster makeover before 2016, that is the way.

The Nets payroll for 2015-16 as of now: approximately $72,311,663: the tax this summer was at $77 million and will be a bit higher next summer, so the Nets are ALREADY flirting with it…and that’s with 10 roster spots to fill.  That number is deceivingly low.

Picking up team options on Plumlee (no brainer), Karasev and Gutierrez (possible), and Teague (doubtful) increases the payroll by about $1.5 million per player. We have not included contracts yet for the Nets second round picks of this summer, any free agents they sign this summer, OR the Nets first round pick and second round pick next year: those numbers will spike the payroll up higher, and now you’re flirting with the tax. Now, the Nets would have decisions to make on their own free agents: Garnett is likely to hang them up next summer if he does not now, and the Nets would then have to decide on Teletovic and Kirilenko going forward: are they worth paying? For how long? Will they accept 1 year deals to not cloud 2016? If they won’t, are they worth clouding the 2016 cap picture? That probably depends on what the cap is expected to be, and is contingent on if Deron is traded (given his salary commitment beyond 2016. No easy answers here.

Given all that, and the hard cap placed on teams that use their MLE, the Nets face a salary crunch next summer where they’re seemingly set to be unable to add more to the roster.

All of which makes the Jarrett Jack trade puzzling, now that we know the Nets’ plans are to cut costs?  Sure the Nets could have used more behind Deron than Gutierrez and Teague.  But Jack struggled a year ago.  The Nets could have used the league minimum on a Toure Murry, a Shelvin Mack, or someone of that ilk (they’re out there: Livingston was a minimum signing after all) with upside, to play backup point guard.  They’d be looking at 70-80% of Jack’s production, but for 10% of the cost.  And when you’re cutting costs, losing players to a numbers game, worried about your financials going forward: that matters.  Given the salary constraints I just outlined, the $6,300,000 owed to Jack in 2015-2016 is a thorn in the side of the Nets tea building nets summer. Costs matter, especially when you say they matter, and there were better value signings than Jack out there given the Nets’ goals of financial flexibility.

And that only breeds more questions: is Teletovic dealt for draft picks? Kirilenko for a second rounder if that’s even scrounge-able.  These were incredulous questions 17 hours ago. Not now.

It’s a new day in Brooklyn. #HelloCostCutting